------- Forwarded message follows -------
Subject:                Re: Bering Lead?
From:                   Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:                     Eric Wolzak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date sent:              Sun, 03 Apr 2005 08:16:10 -0700

Eric,
Please post your reply to our leaf-devel list. I know others are
interested in this topic. K.-P., the Lince team, Erich Titl, and others.


On Sun, 2005-04-03 at 06:48, Eric Wolzak wrote:
> Subject:              Bering Lead?
> From:                 Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:                   Eric Wolzak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date sent:            Fri, 25 Mar 2005 11:12:22 -0800
> 
> > On Mon, 2004-07-05 at 14:14, Eric Wolzak wrote:
> > > sorry for being so quiet for so long,  my new job is takeing lots of 
> > > energy and 
> > > time. ( but positiv stress :) )
> > 
> > Eric,
> > Do you still have time for Bering? If not, would you like to find
> > someone you can pass the branch lead to?
> > 
> Hello Mike, the  situation didn't change much what the time and energy spent 
> on 
> my job. But I now do some more computing in my spare time again :)  
> 
>  I am not sure if it is  wise to furtehr follow the Bering branch.
> It works and it isn't necessary to give up, but I would encourage new users 
> to 
> use the Bering-uclibc which has reach the grown up status now :) 
> The main problem with bering is the old Library, that isn't supported 
> anymore, 
> and new application mostly have to be adapted to be able to compile  under 
> Bering. 
> I am still reading the leaf-user list and standby to answer bering questions, 
> but they are mostly allready answered by others, and most questions depend on 
> the  uclibc thread.
> I could certainly invest some time again in the project. But  updateing the 
> whole Bering stuff to an up to date version would probably extend my limits.
> My request for some time who was interested in joining the "old" Bering team, 
> got only few results. And I am not sure that even if I could build a team, 
> there would be enough people interested in using the "old Bering " Branch.
> I saw the energy I spent in the ISDN branch, and got only very few responses.
> 
> All around me people change to DSL, and with that they get a complete 
> Wireless 
> router for a few bucks. Mostly ( with included Linux or BSD Operating 
> Systems). 
> 
> here isn't much interest in "Basic floppy based Firewalls anymore".
> So my target group will mix with those of the Uclibc crew.
> people that want more than the basic possibilities. 
> 
> I probably will spent some energy in creating applications and fine tuning  
> I am thinking about an encryption  mail proxy  or something like that.
>  
> What do you think. 
> Are there still users of "old Bering"    or is it better to merge with the 
> uclibc group. 
> 
> with kind regards
> 
> Eric Wolzak
> 
> 
> 
> > -- 
> > Mike Noyes <mhnoyes at users.sourceforge.net>
> > http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/
> > SF.net Projects: ffl, leaf, phpwebsite, phpwebsite-comm, sitedocs
> > 
-- 
Mike Noyes <mhnoyes at users.sourceforge.net>
http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/
SF.net Projects: ffl, leaf, phpwebsite, phpwebsite-comm, sitedocs

------- End of forwarded message -------


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click

_______________________________________________
leaf-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel

Reply via email to