Am Mittwoch, 15. März 2006 15:48 schrieb Mike Noyes:
> On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 01:43, Eric Spakman wrote:
> > I think other projects are gaining users because they have a nice
> > webconf interface and are easier to setup by less advanced users, not
> > because they're technical better (in the contrary). We have a nice
> > webconf framework, written by Nathan, but there are only a few persons
> > so far who wrote a package for it..... And we only have limited time.
>
> Eric,
> Have you or anyone else on the bering-uclibc team asked for help?

Yes, the framework and the lack of lwp's has been mentioned from to time on 
the leaf lists. 

> > To gain users we should do something about the user experience, but as
> > long as nobody steps up to create 'lwp' (webconf) packages, there is
> > not much we can do about it.
>
> How would someone help? Is there documentation on creating lwp webconf
> packages? I see a chapter in the install guide, but nothing in the devel
> guide.
>
> http://leaf.sourceforge.net/doc/guide/install-bering-uclibc/Webconf-Configu
>ration.html

The developer configuration is here:
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/doc/guide/webconf-howto.html

and has been available from day one in Nathans cvs repository.

> It also looks like webconf isn't enabled by default.

It has been introduced as default web-interface  and therefor enabled about a 
year ago - the documentation is a little bit older (or just fits for earlier 
LEAF versions :)).

kp


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642

_______________________________________________
leaf-devel mailing list
leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel

Reply via email to