Hi!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Natanael Copa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

<snip>

> > 
> > As a conclusion, i'm looking forward to it.
> 
> Meanwhile, someone else has offered me hosting and has 
> already set up a mediawiki and started to add pages there...
> 
> Even If I don't join LEAF yet, I am willing to cooperate, 
> share experiences etc.

I'm glad to hear that!

> 
> > Maybe you'll come up with solutions that bypass the 
> problems we have 
> > had in the past while testing the 2.6 kernel series.
> > And if still fits on a floppy that is a big plus.
> 
> Exactly what problems did you have with the 2.6 kernel?

Besides being huge ?

Well, the decisions of initrd vs initramfs vs romfs vs how should
the initial boot 'thing' be backed up.

The usefulness of 2.6 kernel in embedded environments like ours.

Which would conclude to mostly being design decisions, not a true
problem. 

I personally think as 2.6 as a still-in-development kernel, with
way too much stuff going on to be considered a stable platform.

And I speak against myself, as i'm involved with it in another
project, the rt2x00 wireless kernel driver. :)

But don't let my words or thoughs cloud your judgement, prepare
something and i'll test and comment.


Luis Correia   
Bering uClibc Team Member

PGP Fingerprint: BC44 D7DA 5A17 F92A CA21 9ABE DFF0 3540 2322 21F6 
Key Server: http://pgp.mit.edu





-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642

_______________________________________________
leaf-devel mailing list
leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel

Reply via email to