Am Donnerstag, 23. November 2006 16:16 schrieb Erich Titl:

Hi Erich;

> Hi Folks
>
> let me please chime in
>
> Mike Noyes wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 01:38, Eric Spakman wrote:
> >> Ok, but back to the documentation issue. BU will always use the latest
> >> stable shorewall version and even with an older version of BU it
> >> shouldn't be a big problem to update to the latest shorewall (especially
> >> 3.0 onwards). Why duplicate the shorewall documentation on the LEAF
> >> site? Isn't it much simpler to just provide a link to Tom's
> >> documentation?
>
> I suggest to build html pages from the shorewall documentation which
> could be inserted on demand using shorwall.lwp for those who run webconf.

Given we add it those our manpages a shorwall.lwp can be enhanced to include 
the link; but then, if you can browse to the router and access a link from 
there to the net, you can also directly browse to the SF pages.

But more important - there is no shorwall.lwp yet!


> I personally liked the documentation within the config files, as they
> provided most of what I always needed.

I believe you always have a second machine around to use the pages from SF - 
most probably the machine from you have ssh'd into the router, I guess.

If you think one should be able to setup a LEAF router without net access and 
with self-contaning docs, we have to discuss adding all available docs to the 
images (except to the floppy) - and lynx.

kp

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV

_______________________________________________
leaf-devel mailing list
leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel

Reply via email to