Am Donnerstag, 23. November 2006 16:16 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi Erich;
> Hi Folks > > let me please chime in > > Mike Noyes wrote: > > On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 01:38, Eric Spakman wrote: > >> Ok, but back to the documentation issue. BU will always use the latest > >> stable shorewall version and even with an older version of BU it > >> shouldn't be a big problem to update to the latest shorewall (especially > >> 3.0 onwards). Why duplicate the shorewall documentation on the LEAF > >> site? Isn't it much simpler to just provide a link to Tom's > >> documentation? > > I suggest to build html pages from the shorewall documentation which > could be inserted on demand using shorwall.lwp for those who run webconf. Given we add it those our manpages a shorwall.lwp can be enhanced to include the link; but then, if you can browse to the router and access a link from there to the net, you can also directly browse to the SF pages. But more important - there is no shorwall.lwp yet! > I personally liked the documentation within the config files, as they > provided most of what I always needed. I believe you always have a second machine around to use the pages from SF - most probably the machine from you have ssh'd into the router, I guess. If you think one should be able to setup a LEAF router without net access and with self-contaning docs, we have to discuss adding all available docs to the images (except to the floppy) - and lynx. kp ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
