14.09.2010 22:15, davidMbrooke пишет: > Hi all, > > I have been following the progress on Bering-uClibc4 with some interest. > Kudos to Andrew and the team for what has been achieved so far! > It seems that we are close to having a stable v4 platform. > For me a 2.6 Kernel, Shorewall 4.x and excellent IPv6 support are all > important, and the extra size is not a big problem. > > We will need some new user (and developer?) documentation for > Bering-uClibc4, at least to reflect the differences from v3 and > preferably to improve on what we have already. I would like to volunteer > to help with this. It's good,
> What other improvements should we aim for? > > > davidMbrooke Now I'm trying to migrate to fresh GCC (4.4.4) & binutils (2.20.1) - it seems that old 3.x GCC tree will not be supported in fresh kernels in near future, and fresh GCC also provides more compact code... Also I'm not sure that wireless in fresh 2.6.35 kernel, that seems broken with gcc-3.3.3, can/will be fixed in future, and migration to 3.4 GCC branch is also non-trivial. But it looks enough hard ... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
