04.11.2010 22:32, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
>
> Hi Andrew;
>
> I'd say the "unoptimized" 486 kernel should be the base, but that's
> nitpicking.
>
> ok, I start to get it :))
>
> I've managed to build the necessary patch, removed kernel and linux (including
> .source by hand) and to rebuild the kernel with 486 process support for the
> start.
>
> I'm wondering why I just built one kernel, I thought
>
> "(for i in $(KARCHS); do \  " (from buildtool.mk in source/linux)
>
> loops over the archs to build every arch added in make/Masterinclude.mk.
>
> Either I'm still doing something wrong, or I'm misleaded.
>
> kp
Can you write step-by-step what you did?
For building another kernel you must:
1) Create .config for it
2) Make diff between 'main' config and your modified one (diff -au 
Bering-uClibc-2.6.35.8 .config >Bering-uClibc-2.6.35.8-newarch.patch)
3) Add 'newarch' into make/Masterinclude.mk
4) Build linux and kernel packages
And then - modify modules & etc packages for .lrp creation for new arch...

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Next 800 Companies to Lead America's Growth: New Video Whitepaper
David G. Thomson, author of the best-selling book "Blueprint to a 
Billion" shares his insights and actions to help propel your 
business during the next growth cycle. Listen Now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SAP-dev2dev

_______________________________________________
leaf-devel mailing list
leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel

Reply via email to