Hi KP at 31.12.2010 07:13, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: > Hi Erich; > > Am Donnerstag, 30. Dezember 2010, 17:01:05 schrieb Erich Titl: >> Hi KP >> >> at 30.12.2010 16:13, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: >>> Hi Erich; >>> ...
> > ok, I can confirm you're right. > Anyway I believe we should just provide sensible defaults to work out-of-the- > box for a basic setup - and our basic setup for ssh is dropbear. If a user > wants to replace it, he has his reasons and I assume he is experierenced > enough to know what he does and how to do it. We have to draw a line somwhere > otherwise we are always behind trying to catch up with config requests. That is a bit the fate of a system integrator :-) > Instead I prefer a small chapter in the wiki. That is fine with me. I can provide a default for sshd_config if needed. > >> Disabling IPv6 as a standard set up is just a suggestion to cater for >> most people. At least where I live IPv6 is not a commodity item. I don't >> know of any ISP here that pushes it (well maybe init7). > > Already added to two lines to /etc/sysctl. :-) > >> Maybe one day I will understand how IPv6 is supposed to work in the real >> world. In the meantime it just clutters my display with unmemorable >> addresses which are not routed. Do you have a a real world IPv6 connection? > > Depends what you define as "real". Currently it's just a tunnel with aiccu, > but > I expect changes in 2011 as my ISP plans to deploy ipv6. That is what I call the real world. If you are full IPv6 is your ISP doing the address translation for you, e.g. who is providing you with an IPv4 address for us poor retarded folks who only now about IPv4. To me it still feels like another dimension I don't know about, like the two dimensional things that cannot think in the third. For example if I want to access a site which is IPv6 only, but I am living in the IPv4 word and do not even know about IPv6, who is doing the routing and translation stuff for me? I dont know about the transition mechanisms. In the meantime I did some more stuff on the kernel config, mainly because I have a number of WRAP boxes deployed and in the current setting the SCx200 modules are just missing. I will probably only use the watchdog timer but the driver architecture in recent 2.6 has changed dramatically as compared to 2.4, so more things are required. I will report when I know more. One more thing, would you agree to a move to a recent haserl version, we are still on 0.8. Else I would have to fork off webconf and with the size limitations falling away there is no reason for not having a powerful web interface anymore. Guten Rutsch Erich ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, and, should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi-node Oracle RAC database without downtime or disruption http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
