Hi KP

on 07.07.2011 20:22, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Hi ERich;
> 
....

> 
> For the time being you are right, and I do not think it will change in the 
> medium future, but I vote to keep them seperated - that's something I've 
> learned from linux distro's like debian, esp. while reading about the hell to 
> package java apps, where dependend libs/programs are packaged with a specific 
> application.
> To be as much as possible modular was one Bering-uClibc target at the start.

Then it is not logical to include haserl in the webconf package and it
should be a package of it's own, which it is not right now.

>  
>>> - Trac ticket #55 (ipsec makes no route?)
>>
>> I _guess_ this is still the same problem with iproute2. There are still
>> instances of ifconfig in the code.
> 
> But we still do provide ifconfig.

That is what I assumed too, but is it really compatible? Many busybox
applets have a different syntax than the real thing.

cheers

Erich

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security 
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes 
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
_______________________________________________
leaf-devel mailing list
leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel

Reply via email to