Hi Erich;

Am Mittwoch, 27. Juli 2011, 08:16:29 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi KP
> 
> at 26.07.2011 20:45, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> > Hi Erich;
> > 
> > Am Montag, 25. Juli 2011, 16:13:08 schrieb Erich Titl:
> >> KP
> >> 
> >> at 25.07.2011 10:12, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> >>> Hi Erich;
> >>> 
> >>> Am Sonntag, 24. Juli 2011, 23:03:23 schrieb Erich Titl:
> >>>> HI KP
> 
> ...
> 
> >>> Updated webconf.lrp and get an error
> >>> 
> >>> haserl CGI Error
> >>> Unknown operation near line 85 of lrcfg.cgi
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> at a lot of places (e.g. every time I call a config file in "expert
> >>> mode"). The same with "Backup Settings", "DSL Settings" and
> >>> "Dropbear.ssh".
> >> 
> >> Sounds like there is old syntax in the .cgi files. This does not happen
> >> at my site. The reason being that I am using haserl 0.9 for quite some
> >> years now.
> 
> ...
> 
> >> Having the .cgi files in a tarball (as in webconf and lwp) makes it
> >> difficult to find out the differences, also possible enhancements which
> >> partially are commented poorly.
> >> 
> >> To make it easier for future enhancement I will explode the webconf
> >> tarball in my local experimental branch and introduce single files.
> > 
> > You're right and I did the same for lwp package; fixed also config.cgi,
> > pppoe.cgi and dropbear.cgi.
> 
> Mhhhh... I have not seen that yet. Did you commit to master?

Yes; see
http://leaf.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=leaf/bering-uclibc;a=summary


> >> I can also look at the current lwp files, they should be pretty easy to
> >> fix, just tedious to find the problems without being able to compare.
> >> 
> >> The easiest way to get quick results is to report single findings here.
> >> I have not been able to find a ticket for it.
> > 
> > See tickets #58 and #60.
> > 
> > You asked for it :)
> 
> I did... just looked at #58, no description of the error though. I will
> look at the line you mentioned in lrcfg.cgi.
> 
> Concerning #60 this does IMHO not belong to the webconf package, as long
> as we have dnscache. I for once do not use dnsmasq, but dnscache and
> would not want to clutter my web interface with stuff I don't install.
> That is the main reason why I would like to see the .cgi files merged
> into the .lrp packages. This way we could avoid things like that at a
> very low overhead.

The same is true for lwp's :)

I'll put it back, but then you'll better remove dnsmasq.cgi from webconf 
tarball.

kp
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Got Input?   Slashdot Needs You.
Take our quick survey online.  Come on, we don't ask for help often.
Plus, you'll get a chance to win $100 to spend on ThinkGeek.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/slashdot-survey

_______________________________________________
leaf-devel mailing list
leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel

Reply via email to