Hi Erich; Am Mittwoch, 27. Juli 2011, 08:16:29 schrieb Erich Titl: > Hi KP > > at 26.07.2011 20:45, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: > > Hi Erich; > > > > Am Montag, 25. Juli 2011, 16:13:08 schrieb Erich Titl: > >> KP > >> > >> at 25.07.2011 10:12, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: > >>> Hi Erich; > >>> > >>> Am Sonntag, 24. Juli 2011, 23:03:23 schrieb Erich Titl: > >>>> HI KP > > ... > > >>> Updated webconf.lrp and get an error > >>> > >>> haserl CGI Error > >>> Unknown operation near line 85 of lrcfg.cgi > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> at a lot of places (e.g. every time I call a config file in "expert > >>> mode"). The same with "Backup Settings", "DSL Settings" and > >>> "Dropbear.ssh". > >> > >> Sounds like there is old syntax in the .cgi files. This does not happen > >> at my site. The reason being that I am using haserl 0.9 for quite some > >> years now. > > ... > > >> Having the .cgi files in a tarball (as in webconf and lwp) makes it > >> difficult to find out the differences, also possible enhancements which > >> partially are commented poorly. > >> > >> To make it easier for future enhancement I will explode the webconf > >> tarball in my local experimental branch and introduce single files. > > > > You're right and I did the same for lwp package; fixed also config.cgi, > > pppoe.cgi and dropbear.cgi. > > Mhhhh... I have not seen that yet. Did you commit to master?
Yes; see http://leaf.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=leaf/bering-uclibc;a=summary > >> I can also look at the current lwp files, they should be pretty easy to > >> fix, just tedious to find the problems without being able to compare. > >> > >> The easiest way to get quick results is to report single findings here. > >> I have not been able to find a ticket for it. > > > > See tickets #58 and #60. > > > > You asked for it :) > > I did... just looked at #58, no description of the error though. I will > look at the line you mentioned in lrcfg.cgi. > > Concerning #60 this does IMHO not belong to the webconf package, as long > as we have dnscache. I for once do not use dnsmasq, but dnscache and > would not want to clutter my web interface with stuff I don't install. > That is the main reason why I would like to see the .cgi files merged > into the .lrp packages. This way we could avoid things like that at a > very low overhead. The same is true for lwp's :) I'll put it back, but then you'll better remove dnsmasq.cgi from webconf tarball. kp ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Got Input? Slashdot Needs You. Take our quick survey online. Come on, we don't ask for help often. Plus, you'll get a chance to win $100 to spend on ThinkGeek. http://p.sf.net/sfu/slashdot-survey _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel