On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 17:41 +0300, Andrew wrote:
> 17.09.2011 16:43, davidMbrooke пишет:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying to do a complete rebuild and "build buildenv" is failing
> > almost right away. In log/buildtoollog I get:
> >     buildtool::Download::download:file key: linux-2.6.35.13.tar.bz2
> >     --2011-09-17 13:33:50--
> > http://www.de.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/longterm/v2.6.35/linux-2.6.35.13.tar.bz2
> >     Resolving www.de.kernel.org... failed: Name or service not known.
> >     wget: unable to resolve host address “www.de.kernel.org”
> >
> > When I try to browse www.kernel.org I get a message saying "Down for
> > maintenance". Presumably this is related to the recent security issues
> > at kernel.org.
> >
> > IMHO we would be better off storing the kernel source as part of our own
> > repository. I deleted all of my downloaded source so I don't now have a
> > copy of the kernel source to upload.
> >
> > Does anybody else have a copy of the 2.6.35.13 source, and does anyone
> > disagree that we should maintain our own copy?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > davidMbrooke
> >
> Kernel was taken from kernel.org because kernel.org was one of 
> constantly-available resources and because kernel is enough heavy - just 
> to make git/cvs repo smaller. Another things that are taken from 
> internet - gcc/binutils.
> I added 2.6.35.14 into git tree. IMHO it isn't too much place for 
> discussions here - in any case, missed source shouldn't be a showstopper 
> for developers; decision will be done when kernel.org backs online - but 
> I think that sources were laid into tree just because they are already 
> into git tree :)

Thanks Andrew. That fixed it for me.

dMb



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BlackBerry® DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rim-devcon-copy2

_______________________________________________
leaf-devel mailing list
leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel

Reply via email to