On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 17:41 +0300, Andrew wrote: > 17.09.2011 16:43, davidMbrooke пишет: > > Hi, > > > > I'm trying to do a complete rebuild and "build buildenv" is failing > > almost right away. In log/buildtoollog I get: > > buildtool::Download::download:file key: linux-2.6.35.13.tar.bz2 > > --2011-09-17 13:33:50-- > > http://www.de.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/longterm/v2.6.35/linux-2.6.35.13.tar.bz2 > > Resolving www.de.kernel.org... failed: Name or service not known. > > wget: unable to resolve host address “www.de.kernel.org” > > > > When I try to browse www.kernel.org I get a message saying "Down for > > maintenance". Presumably this is related to the recent security issues > > at kernel.org. > > > > IMHO we would be better off storing the kernel source as part of our own > > repository. I deleted all of my downloaded source so I don't now have a > > copy of the kernel source to upload. > > > > Does anybody else have a copy of the 2.6.35.13 source, and does anyone > > disagree that we should maintain our own copy? > > > > Thanks, > > davidMbrooke > > > Kernel was taken from kernel.org because kernel.org was one of > constantly-available resources and because kernel is enough heavy - just > to make git/cvs repo smaller. Another things that are taken from > internet - gcc/binutils. > I added 2.6.35.14 into git tree. IMHO it isn't too much place for > discussions here - in any case, missed source shouldn't be a showstopper > for developers; decision will be done when kernel.org backs online - but > I think that sources were laid into tree just because they are already > into git tree :)
Thanks Andrew. That fixed it for me. dMb ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ BlackBerry® DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA http://p.sf.net/sfu/rim-devcon-copy2 _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
