On Sun, 2012-03-18 at 23:59 +0200, Andrew wrote: > 18.03.2012 19:44, davidMbrooke пишет: > > > > I'm also thinking about what the "ARCH" arguments to buildtool.pl and > > buildpacket.pl should look like. Maybe we just use the GCC "target > > triplet" syntax, so e.g. > > i486-pc-linux-uclibc for the Bering-uClibc 4.x platform > > armv6-unknown-linux-uclibc for the Raspberry pi > > > > In other words, "buildtool.pl --target=i486-pc-linux-uclibc build ..." > > rather than "buildtool.pl --arch=i386 build ..." > > > > Thoughts? > > > > David > AFAIK there is no difference between '-pc-linux-uclibc' and > '-unknown-linux-uclibc' suffixes, and IMHO it'll be safe to use > i486-unknown-linux-uclibc arch.
Thanks Andrew. I therefore propose to identify the different toolchains with "GNU_TARGET_NAME" strings like i486-unknown-linux-uclibc, instead of "ARCH" strings like i386. I will add a "-t toolchain" argument to buildtool.pl and default this to i486-unknown-linux-uclibc so as to preserve the current behaviour. I have these changes working in my development environment now (plus a few other changes to prepare for non-x86 platforms) but I want to review those again before adding to Git (hopefully tomorrow). david ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF email is sponsosred by: Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
