Am 21.08.2012 16:04, schrieb Yves Blusseau: > Hi all, > > source configuration files can be defined by a Source or Package block. For > me it's exactly the same, if a source is declared as Package or Source. > So are you agree with me to simplify the declaration of the source > configuration files with only a Source block (because the block define where > a source distribution can be "download", not a package (.lrp)) ?
Martin explained it in the first documenatation: "The difference between sources and packages You might be a bit confused why in the above output there are Sources and Packages. The main reason for having sources and packages separately is that there are some sources out there that produce programs used in several packages. Or in other words, it sometimes makes sense to just build the sources (like util-linux for example) only once and create several packages out of the resulting binaries." But I believe it was never really used (consequently) that way, so it seems unnecessary. > The blocks Package will be keep for the declaration in buildtool.cfg files. > > If you are okay, i will also simplify the perl code to only keep the load of > Source blocks. > > What are you think about this ? I have no objection. kp ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
