Thank you for the answer :-)
Yes I have downloaded and compiled the Bering uClibc 5.x.
I am using ubuntu 12.04LTS and the 5.x toolchain compiled like a charm.
The thing that stop me before it is because I don't catch where to work.
For example, I have tried to touch dnsmasq-2.63.tar.gz in the "repo" or
in "source" and I have tried to touch "*.c" in "dnsmasq-2.63/src", but
every times I tried to rebuild the package, nothing compile.
./buildtool.pl build dnsmasq
make the list of required source packages: nothing to do [0.K.]
make the list of required build packages: nothing to do [0.K.]
Do I have to run ./buildtool.pl srcclean evrytimes to force compilation
after source modifications?
-----Original Message-----
From: KP Kirchdoerfer <kap...@users.sourceforge.net>
Reply-to: kap...@users.sourceforge.net
To: leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [leaf-devel] Problem compiling
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:53:11 +0100
Am 18.02.2013 00:23, schrieb Hervé Delmas:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I would like to compile a small program for my Bering Uclibc 4.3. I
> read the Developer Guide but I am not sure I get it. I tried to modify
> an existing package locally on my computer, but the buildtool seems to
> compare the source on the git repository. Is there a way to compile
> source locally modified on my computer?
>
> Is there an "hello world" program that I can use to start?
No;
I assume you have downloaded and extracted the complete sources tarball
(e.g. Bering-uClibc_4.3.3_src.tgz)
Next run
./buildtool.pl build buildenv (or build toolchain for 5.x)
If that doesn't work you either do have all required host files/apps or
it isn't working as we expected (note: the 5.x toolchain improved a lot
to be "self-hosted").
Modify repo/packagename/buildtool.cfg and buildtool.mk to fit your
needs, you also need the new source package in that directory, or
declare a new file if you just want to add patch.
Next run ./buildtool.pl build packagename
if it fails, look at log/buildtool.log change the buildtool.cfg|mk and do a
./buildtool.pl srcclean packagename before running the build again.
A "hello world" program will soon be cluttered if we try to explain
everything; a good start will be an "easy" package like dnsmasq.
> Is there an easier way to have a developing environment. I am thinking
> to something I can run native in a virtual machine for examples (like in
> virtualBox).
I do have one, but it just free's you of step one (build buildenv) and
is a lot slower (6hrs for a complete build compared to 2hrs)
Maybe we can give more help, if you are more specfic (package,
buildtool.* and buildtoollog snippet).
kp
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel - in partnership with Geeknet,
is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought
leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials, tech docs,
whitepapers, evaluation guides, and opinion stories. Check out the most
recent posts - join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
leaf-devel mailing list
leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel - in partnership with Geeknet,
is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought
leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials, tech docs,
whitepapers, evaluation guides, and opinion stories. Check out the most
recent posts - join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
leaf-devel mailing list
leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
