> > Before 4.x we had a pretty usable vi, with probably all the bugs one can > think of. The busybox stuff may be nice but is typically just a meager > replacement for the REAL thing. I am under the impression that for the > sake of new platforms and kernel features we are loosing some of the > stability and usability of former releases.
busybox/vi work well and can do the major thing we can do with vi. e3vi work very well too (but can’t be compiled on non x86 platform). elvis-tiny is known to have some bug (see: http://packages.ubuntu.com/fr/lucid/editors/elvis-tiny) : You should install another vi-editor (such as « vim", "elvis" or "nvi") if you want a vi editor that is full featured and has no bugs. vim has full fetaures, and can be compiled on the major platform. So the only problem is elvis-tiny that segfault sometimes according to arch, compilation options, etc… Regards, Yves
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft
_______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
