Perplexing...

So, it appears the modules are loading ok in both instances.  

>From Michael's quote of 'Starting all WANPIPE devices:', one can narrow
his  down to the wanpipe.lrp from Sangoma, as the one from LRP 2.9.8 has
a different start message.

One thing I noticed in the Dachstein-CD changelog was the moving of
ifconfig from a few packages into it's own separate one.  Check and see
if it still exists in /sbin.  If not, you'll have to add it to your
syslinux.cfg or lrpkg.cfg? file as wanrouter depends on it.  One would
suspect that there'd be some sort of message in syslog though.

As well, check under /proc/net/wanrouter for any files & cat them for
any clues.

You might also want to peruse ftp://ftp.sangoma.com/linux/ and try to
identify the exact version of the modules you're running, it could be
that newer ones would help.

HTH,
Doug.

Eddie Wilson wrote:
> 
> My log appears much the same.
> 
> wanpipe: Probing for WANPIPE hardware
> wanpipe: S508-ISA card found, port 0x360
> wanpipe: Allocating maximum 2 devices: wanpipe1 - wanpipe2
> 
> Looks normal but no interface exists.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From:   Michael D. Schleif [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent:   Monday, November 26, 2001 12:03 AM
> To:     Doug O'Halloran
> Cc:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject:        Re: [Leaf-user] wanpipe
> 
<...snip...>
> In my case, syslogd messages show that the four (4) .O files from
> Sangoma's wanpipe.lrp are functioning and without error.  There is *no*
> ominous statement like your example.
> 
> For me, the most startling indicator is this:
> 
>         Starting all WANPIPE devices:
> 
> When I review /usr/sbin/wanrouter, case start), I cannot see any
> condition under which *NOTHIING* more is echo'd than this line, unless
> there is *NO* file in /etc/wanpipe/ ;<
> 
> Nevertheless, that line is all that I see, then starting the eth0
> interface.  Sometimes, depending on which errant configuration
> permutation I use, I will get three of these:
> 
>         Cannot find device "wanpipe1"
> 
> Or, this:
> 
>         Error: an inet prefix is expected rather than "dev".
> 
> Any ideas?
> 
> > "Michael D. Schleif" wrote:
> > >
> > > Any luck on this?
> > >
> > > I've spent much of the last two days trying to get this to work --
> > > without success ;<
> > >
> > > As Eddie said, everything appears to work, except there is *no*
> > > interface . . .
> > >
> > > Eddie Wilson wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Has anyone configured Dachstein-CD to use a wanpipe card?
> > > >
> > > > I started with LRP 2.9.8 then switched to eigerstein kernel to support
> > > > ipsec. I am unable to get ipsec running so I have decided to start from
> > > > scratch with Dachstein-CD.
> > > >
> > > > I have had no previous problems with wanpipe but I don't get an interface
> > > > using DCD. The drivers seem to load without error messages but no device is
> > > > created.
> 
> --
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> mds
> mds resource
> 888.250.3987
> 
> Dare to fix things before they break . . .
> 
> Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional to how much we
> think we know.  The more I know, the more I know I don't know . . .
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leaf-user mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user

_______________________________________________
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user

Reply via email to