Dan,

Thanks for the response.


> Do you have the subnet set to 255.255.248.0 or wider across all the machines
> across the LAN & DMZ?
All subnet masks are 255.255.255.0 Is that OK?
 
>         Instead, I usually use 192.168.1.x for the internal LAN and 192.168.0.x for
> the DMZ zone; with a "double-C" subnet of 255.255.254.0.
> 
>         If I only have one server in the DMZ - Better since it's easier to harden a
> single machine - I assign it 192.168.1.2, and the rest of the machines inside
> the firewall 192.168.1.3 through ...250.

The DMZ will be a single machine. Primarily a game server and FTP server
for tranferring files from work to home and back that are too large to
email. I am confused be your response where you say 192.168.0.x for the
DMZ but later say you assigned it 192.168.1.2. What am I missing?
My main subnet is all using fixed IPs of 192.168.1.x. This consists of a
houseful of Win 98 machines used for email and web access primarily. The
DMX is a Redhat machine.

Thanks,

Kory 
>         Hope this helps!
>         Dan
> 
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From:  Kory Krofft
> >Sent: Tuesday, December 25, 2001 4:09 PM
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: [Leaf-user] adding a subnet
> >
> >
> >Merry Christmas!
> >I am adding a subnet so I can later open it up as a DMZ. I have made
> >some progess so far. Using Dachstein floppy my plan looks like this:
> >eth0 Public side of the lrp
> >eth1 private net 1 using 192.168.1 subnet
> >eth2 private net 2 (DMZ) using 192.168.10 subnet
> >
> >LRP can ping both subnets
> >subnets cannot ping each other
> >192.168.10 cannot ping anything
> >192.168.1 has full internet access but cannot ping past firewall(name
> >resolution works)
> >
> >Assume the simplest errors and send me a note please. If you wish to see
> >a particular config file just ask and I will post the pertinent section.
> >
> >Thank you,
> >
> >Kory Krofft


_______________________________________________
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user

Reply via email to