I ran into this problem - it was a pretty easy change - I changed my subnet to 192.168.2.0/24 and altered all programs that specify a listen on IP as 192.168.1.254 and everything was good. Now I have a VPN between two dachstein routers (yaay). This is actually one of the very cool things about Dachstein/LEAF, because AFAIK most linksys type routers are kind of hard coded with the ip block....
S >From: "Michael D. Schleif" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: LEAF <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: [Leaf-user] ipsec gateways & same private networks ??? >Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2001 15:45:10 -0600 > > >This must be a common problem ;> > >Suppose that there are two (2) Dachstein-CD firewalls masquerading two >(2) distinct internal networks that happen to use the same private >subnets (e.g., 192.168.1.0/24). > ><http://freeswan.org/freeswan_trees/freeswan-1.91/doc/config.html> is >pretty emphatic: > >``Note, however, that the two subnets must have distinct addresses. You >cannot have them both masqueraded to the same range of RFC 1918 >addresses.'' > >Again, this must be a fairly common problem. As you know, we prefer >*not* to change any network addressing . . . > >What to do if both networks are using same private subnet ??? > >What do you think? > >-- > >Best Regards, > >mds >mds resource >888.250.3987 > >Dare to fix things before they break . . . > >Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional to how much we >think we know. The more I know, the more I know I don't know . . . > >_______________________________________________ >Leaf-user mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user _________________________________________________________________ Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com _______________________________________________ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
