Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
>
> is the difference between EXTERN_TCP_PORTS and EXTERN_TCP_PORT[0-9]{1,}
> that it's more pleasing to the eye to look at
>
> EXTERN_TCP_PORT0="0/0 ssh"
> EXTERN_TCP_PORT1="0/0 www"
> EXTERN_TCP_PORT2="0/0 smtp"
> EXTERN_TCP_PORT3="0/0 6346"
>
> than
>
> EXTERN_TCP_PORTS="0/0_ssh 0/0_www 0/0_smtp 0/0_1023 0/0_6346"
>
> or is there a real difference other than aesthetics between these
> variables?
Actually, I prefer this:
EXTERN_TCP_PORTS="
0/0_ssh
0/0_www
0/0_smtp
0/0_1023
0/0_6346
"
Except, when I need all of the features offered by this syntax:
SrcAddr/Mask port [ DestAddr[/DestMask] ]
--
Best Regards,
mds
mds resource
888.250.3987
Dare to fix things before they break . . .
Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional to how much we
think we know. The more I know, the more I know I don't know . . .
_______________________________________________
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
