On Monday 28 January 2002 22:17, Michael D. Schleif wrote:

> We put a wins server on one side; but, that did not make windoze all
> of that windoze functionality possible.
>
> So, we blew away that wins server and put samba (nmb-207.lrp) on each
> gateway.  It's taken some tweaking and reading man smb.conf
> <http://us6.samba.org/samba/docs/man/smb.conf.5.html>.
>
> Still, windoze functionality is severely lacking across the wan!
>
> Do the samba servers need to communicate with each other?  If so, the
> DCD gateways cannot ping each other, because they are concurrent with
> the gateway itself -- although, from anywhere else on the remote
> network, we can ping the opposite gateway by private address.
>
> What do you think?

[disclaimer.... this has simply been my experience and may not 
reflect the experience of other frustrated sysadmin's who are likely
smarter than me]

It would be nice, but Samba still doesn't support more than one WINS
server that I know of. There is a remote sync option that might get you
somewhere, but I'm afraid from my experience things will probably not
be as nice as your hoping. 

<rant>
>From my experience, since M$ has been kind enough to break many RFC's
and integrate some bastard implementation of DNS and WINS combined 
together in Win2K/XP and feels the desire to take over all other servers
running similar services (even when told not to !)........ </rant>

Win2K Pro/Server/XP will still only run half-ass'ed unless all shares 
are implicitly mapped. I un-upgraded my systems and went back to NT, as
have a couple of other SysAdmin's I know doing similar "experiments".
NT runs perfectly in this setup, so I blame the DNS/WINS integration as
the only difference I can note between the two OS's. Samba also runs
perfectly _if_ no Win2K/XP servers are on the system. Mapping makes
things tolerable, but was not feasible on the system I was running.

Maybe someone else has figured something better out, but I ran out of
idea's personally. I'm just lucky I hadn't bought a bunch of client
licenses for Win2K before deciding it wasn't in my best interest. 

If you happen to figure something better out, _please_ let me know!

-- 

~Lynn Avants
aka Guitarlynn

guitarlynn at users.sourceforge.net
http://leaf.sourceforge.net

If linux isn't the answer, you've probably got the wrong question!

_______________________________________________
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user

Reply via email to