pn] Sorry 'bout the private message, Charles. I haven't posted to the list in months, and I hit reply by habit.
--- Charles Steinkuehler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > " Whether you want a DMZ or not (YES, PROXY, NAT, PRIVATE, NO) " > > YES - This is a traditional "routed" DMZ...your ISP routes a block of IP's > to the external interface of your firewall > > PROXY - A "Proxy-ARP" DMZ...used if you've got a block of static IP's from > your ISP. The firewall essentially "glues together" two identical network > segments, allowing your DMZ systems to be configured with public IP's (just > like they were connected directly to your upstream modem), but still having > the protection of a firewall. pn] I'm not sure I understand the distinction. If both use public IPs for the DMZ machines, and in both cases traffic comes/goes through the external router/firewall interface, what makes each different from the other? Maybe a small example would help. ===== ----- Peter Nosko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) This is a good place for a tagline. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Greetings - Send FREE e-cards for every occasion! http://greetings.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
