> Is this more of what you are thinking???
> http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/thc/dox/pa.txt

sort of, well, except i don't have a cisco router, so it'd be

(I have 216.158.54.224/29 routed to 207.245.72.146)


                      [Internet]
                          |
                         eth0
                          |
               LEAF Box (207.245.72.146)
                          |
                         eth1
                          |
        -------------------------------------
        |                 |                 |
    Computer 1        Computer 2        Computer 3
 (216.158.54.224)  (216.158.54.225)  (216.158.54.226)
  (192.168.1.1)     (192.168.1.2)      (192.168.1.3)

With the leaf box only letting ports 22 and 80 inbound to the 3 computers.

Right now I have the LEAF box as 207.245.72.153, setup as an IP
masquerading firewall, with port 80 forwarding to computer 3, and port 22
forwarding to computer 2.

Would it be better to just have 216.158.54.224, .225, and .226 set as
aliases for the leaf box, and use the INTERN_SERVERS to forward same ports
to different internal IPs depending on the external ip?

Thanks,
Kevin

-- 
 (kevin mudrick)   ([EMAIL PROTECTED])   (www.bleachedwhale.com)
  pgp key available at http://www.bleachedwhale.com/kevinGPG.asc

 Despair: It's always darkest just before it goes pitch black.




_______________________________________________
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user

Reply via email to