> Is this more of what you are thinking??? > http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/thc/dox/pa.txt
sort of, well, except i don't have a cisco router, so it'd be (I have 216.158.54.224/29 routed to 207.245.72.146) [Internet] | eth0 | LEAF Box (207.245.72.146) | eth1 | ------------------------------------- | | | Computer 1 Computer 2 Computer 3 (216.158.54.224) (216.158.54.225) (216.158.54.226) (192.168.1.1) (192.168.1.2) (192.168.1.3) With the leaf box only letting ports 22 and 80 inbound to the 3 computers. Right now I have the LEAF box as 207.245.72.153, setup as an IP masquerading firewall, with port 80 forwarding to computer 3, and port 22 forwarding to computer 2. Would it be better to just have 216.158.54.224, .225, and .226 set as aliases for the leaf box, and use the INTERN_SERVERS to forward same ports to different internal IPs depending on the external ip? Thanks, Kevin -- (kevin mudrick) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (www.bleachedwhale.com) pgp key available at http://www.bleachedwhale.com/kevinGPG.asc Despair: It's always darkest just before it goes pitch black. _______________________________________________ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user