Hi Claas Claas Anders Rathje wrote the following at 22:09 16.07.2002: >On Tue, 16 Jul 2002 21:23:35 +0200 >Erich Titl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > OK > > > > Just a shot in the dark.... > > > > You have to tell the LEAF/LRP box to NAT the traffic from 192.168.0.x to > > your external address and vice versa and route it through 192.168.1.253, > > unless you do another NAT on your server. > >Well, it routes through 192.168.1.253 because i can telnet on my lrp box >and ping clients in the .0.x net... But how do I tell the LRP box to route >.1.1 as it does AND .0.x ? > > > Why don't you connect the 192.168.0.x network directly to your LEAF/LRP > > box? This might make life easier. > >Well... Then I would need another NIC and another loooooong cable ;)
Not necessarily, I don't know why your server needs 2 NICS :-(, but whatever... >But I >think it would be the same because I can tell the machine i'm sitting on >to be 192.168.0.2 for example and *bing* I cannot connect to the WWW >anymore and this one iss direktly (well theres a switch between me and the >LRP Box) connected... That is still my problem... I don't know Eigerstein but the problem I see is that you have to NAT something you are not even directly connected to. This means IMHO that you have to actively modify the NAT rules in that box. I think this is something the configuration was not meant to be THINK Püntenstrasse 39 8143 Stallikon mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Fingerprint: BC9A 25BC 3954 3BC8 C024 8D8A B7D4 FF9D 05B8 0A16 ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber - The world's fastest growing real-time communications platform! Don't just IM. Build it in! http://www.jabber.com/osdn/xim ------------------------------------------------------------------------ leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
