>  I know over the last two years, I've seen several threads on this,
> however, I still haven't seen a definitive answer.
>
>  I have a eigerstein box I want to test the throughput, bandwidth,
> whatever it's called on.
>
>  What's the best method to simulate a high load?
>
> Suggestions are welcome!

It depends a lot on the type of load you're trying to simulate.  The
previously mentioned ttcp is easy to use, but simulates only a single
point-point high bandwidth stream.  To really test routers & firewalls,
you typically need to generate a broad spectrum of traffic, including
multiple source/destination IP's, varying packet sizes, varying
protocols & source/desination IP's, etc.

Typically, the highest load is placed on routers when there are lots of
small packets from varying IP's traversing the box...this is much harder
to process than the same amount of bandwidth consisting of only large IP
packets (there's lots of processing required for each IP packet on a
firewall, while simply moving the data around is pretty easy with modern
bus-mastering PCI NIC's).

There are commercial devices designed to test routers and firewalls,
configurable to produce virtually limitless variations of IP traffic.
If you can get your hands on one of these, you could test for whatever
parameters are important in your application.

Besides ttcp, there are some other software based traffic genrators that
may be useful...I don't remember any off-hand, but IIRC, there are at
least a handful of programs floating around intended to serve as
load-generators for web-servers and the like which could probably be
pressed into service for testing a router/firewall.  If you only use
ttcp, make sure you at least play a bit with the packet sizes...

Charles Steinkuehler
http://lrp.steinkuehler.net
http://c0wz.steinkuehler.net (lrp.c0wz.com mirror)

P.S.  You won't actually need ttcp.lrp unless you want to check
bandwidth with the firewall box as an endpoint...while perhaps
interesting, this is not exactly "normal" traffic for a firewall/router,
so it doesn't necessarily translate directly into useful performance
numbers in actual use.



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
------------------------------------------------------------------------
leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html

Reply via email to