Thanks for the response Vladimir!

Put together a sketch with Visio that I was going to post... fired 
everything up again tonight to pull the arp and route information and 
another idea finally hit me.  Surprisingly enough, it seems like the right 
idea. ;-)

It seems that having the wireless interfaces on another subnet really 
messes things up!  I'm guessing, but I think that selecting the default 
gateway IP (on the wired subnet) creates problems when you try to select 
netcs0 as the device to use to get there!  Makes sense when you stop and 
think about it.  I put the wireless interfaces on the same subnet as the 
wired and everything seems to be working close to correctly.  Even tried 
using the same IP as the wired card in each box and had the same success.

I do have some new questions now however!

1) when I was having all the trouble I saw in ps ax that some sort of ping 
function was running now and then.  What is it and what does it do?

2) I can't seem to get a dynamic ip across the bridge.  Should I be able 
to?  If so, where should I start to look given that the configuration is 
pretty much 'out of the box' with the exception of the IP's, ESSID etc.?

3) My bering box has a third lucent card in it (besides the two in the 
wisp boxes) using ad-hoc and channel 6.  I put the wisp boxes on channel 1 
and found I was losing around 60% of my packets.  Shutting down the card 
on the bering box fixed the problem.  But, I thought that channels 1, 6 
and 12 were far enough apart not to cause interference.  Any thoughts?

Thanks!  I'm anxious to poke around this package a little more now that 
the basics are going!

Brock

On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Vladimir I. wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Can you provide a small diagram (ASCII text is ok.. ) and a copy of routing 
> table and ARP table contents?
> 
> Brock Nanson wrote:
> > I've got two test boxes running 2312 and Lucent cards.  After some trial and
> > error, the two will talk back and forth (192.168.100.0 subnet used for the
> > wireless cards) and I thought I was ready to get the bridging to work.
> > 
> > The bridged network is 192.168.1.0 (/25 if that matters).  I have a bering
> > box between the LAN and the Internet.  I've set the bering box as the
> > default gateway on both wisp boxes.  Both boxes have the gateway device set
> > as the 'closest' device to the bering gateway.  So the local wisp uses eth0
> > and the remote uses netcs0.
> > 
> > I plugged a notebook into the 'remote' wisp box and can ping it
> > successfully.
> > 
> > The wisp boxes have different IP's on all interfaces, on the subnets noted
> > above.  In both cases, the eth0 port shows up as the default route for
> > 192.168.1.0/25.
> > 
> > The problem I have is that the routing table seems to be updated
> > incorrectly... and I can't find what triggers the problem.  Essentially, I
> > don't always get the route entry appearing with the correct interface.  That
> > is, the remote wisp as an example will update the route table to use eth0
> > for a target located on the other side of the bridge.  It seems that if the
> > connection is initiated from the main LAN, the tables are configured
> > correctly.  But if the notebook in the remote end initiates a connection,
> > the routing table is incorrect.  I can manually change the table and have it
> > work, so the basics are there.
> > 
> > I notice some occurrences in the arp table of the same IP twice, with the
> > second entry shown as "incomplete" if that helps.
> > 
> > I'm betting I'm missing something simple here, but I can't see it!  What
> > specific information can I provide to troubleshoot this?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Brock Nanson
> > Kamloops BC
> > Canada
> > 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Brock Nanson
Kamloops BC Canada



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone?  Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
------------------------------------------------------------------------
leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html

Reply via email to