On Wed, 2004-05-05 at 01:57, freeman wrote:
> As I understand this is a contentious issue and has been decided upon,
> and I respect the right of the administrators to make this decision (and
> hugely, appreciate the time and trouble of the administrators to setup &
> run the list). But respectfully I would disagree with the trade-off.
Scott,
Our list has run this way for quite a while. The next time I see us
revisiting this topic is when SourceForge upgrades Mailman. SF also
discourages this practice in its Site Documentation.
G7. Mailing List services: Reply-To munging
http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=6693&group_id=1
Does Mozilla Thunderbird have a reply-to-list function? A Reply-to-list
option solves most of these issues.
> Thanks Mike (et al), for all your fantastic LEAF work - no disagreement
> there, methinks :)
Thanks. I try. :-)
--
Mike Noyes <mhnoyes at users.sourceforge.net>
http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/
SF.net Projects: ffl, leaf, phpwebsite, phpwebsite-comm, sitedocs
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g.
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click
------------------------------------------------------------------------
leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
