-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Tom Eastep wrote:
>>> >>>Would there be a way to implicitly define such a rule, so it does not >>>get amiss anymore. > > > I suppose we could consider adding some ICMP rules to the Drop and > Reject common actions. The code in CVS projects Shorewall2 and LrpN now accepts ICMP 3 code 4 (fragmentation needed) and ICMP 11 (TTL exceeded) in both the Reject and Drop chains. - -Tom - -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Public Key \ https://lists.shorewall.net/teastep.pgp.key -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBZdvEO/MAbZfjDLIRAmSUAJ95XJPF8KVmqbC7Xo7yzllIa6JH3ACeJUZq UimeCY7MA9oYGvwnuCPAEQk= =C1Gj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl ------------------------------------------------------------------------ leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
