I think I tried it on uclibc 2.0.2 or whatnot. Maybe 2.2 is working. Didn't mean to spread FUD! Rick.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Hejl Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004 1:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Natsemi.o Hi Bob, Robert K Coffman Jr - Info From Data Corporation wrote: >>I have not had luck with Bering uclibc -- some of my nics are natsemi, > > and I could not get a working natsemi.o. > > Is this really an issue? I've got several 1.2 boxes that I was planning on > eventually moving to uclibc but this would be a showstopper. It is no issue that I'm aware of (and I have 5 boxes that need the natsemi driver, all running various versions of Bering uClibc). natsemi.o is even part of modules.lrp on the base image, so you don't even need to use the modules tarball. The only real change from Bering (that I'm aware of) is that with the Bering uClibc kernel, natsemi.o depends on crc32.o, so you'll need to load that module too. Martin ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click ------------------------------------------------------------------------ leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idU88&alloc_id065&op=click ------------------------------------------------------------------------ leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
