Tom =>

* Tom Eastep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005:10:22:10:57:37-0700] scribed:
> On Saturday 22 October 2005 10:28, Tom Eastep wrote:
> > On Saturday 22 October 2005 06:39, Michael D Schleif wrote:
> > > Tested Scenarios
> > > ----------------
> > > I. When I do this:
> > >
> > >     DNAT  net  loc:$A:22  tcp  60022
> > >
> > > then, I can successfully ssh from [C] to [A]; but, the proxy at [B]
> > > prevents ssh from [B] to [A].
> > >
> > > II. When I do this:
> > >
> > >     DNAT  net  loc:$A:22  tcp  443
> > >
> > > shorewall *fails* to allow the connection from anywhere to [A]; and
> > > there are *NO* messages in /var/log/shorewall.log.
> >
> > To Shorewall, there is absolutely no difference between those two cases.
> 
> Given that fact of life, you need to look outside of that particular rule for 
> the root of the problem. 
> 
> a) Is there a DNAT or NONAT rule for port 443 earlier in the rules file?
> b) There are DNAT troubleshooting instructions in Shorewall FAQs 1a and 1b 
> that may help you.
> 
> -Tom
> -- 
> Tom Eastep    \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool
> Shoreline,     \ http://shorewall.net
> Washington USA  \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> PGP Public Key   \ https://lists.shorewall.net/teastep.pgp.key

Wow!  Thank you -- and on the weekend to boot ...

I found it, corrected it, and now it works!  Your troubleshooting FAQ's
did help me, especially 1b.  At first, I wanted to dismiss them, because
I had already ruled out everything in 1a; but, taking my patience paid
off ;>

Thank you, for all of your work, and your sound advice ...

-- 
Best Regards,

mds
mds resource
877.596.8237
-
Dare to fix things before they break . . .
-
Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional to how much
we think we know.  The more I know, the more I know I don't know . . .
--

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to