Hi Martin at 02.10.2012 14:14, Martin Hejl wrote: > Hi Erich, > >> I felt pretty sure, as I checked the set up more that once. BUt yes, you >> are right, pulling down the interface shows that indeed the ethernet >> numbering had nothing to do with the way I am used to. > Indeed - it was quite a surprise to me at the time too, since one > expects all kinds of issues when trying a new piece of hardware, but not > that the network ports are arranged as "eth1 eth3 eth2 eth0" on one > model (NSA 1040), and "eth2 eth3 eth0 eth1" on the other (NSA 1045)...
I _guess_ we need the nameif applet in Busybox to really address this issue. At least it appears to me as one possible solution. cheers Erich
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Kryptografische Unterschrift
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Don't let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APM Deploy New Relic app performance management and know exactly what is happening inside your Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, and .NET app Try New Relic at no cost today and get our sweet Data Nerd shirt too! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic-dev2dev
------------------------------------------------------------------------ leaf-user mailing list: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user Support Request -- http://leaf-project.org/
