What image you're using? 2546 has all necessary devices already. "stefan stДnz @ sichtwerk" wrote about "Re: ipsec on wisp": > thanks you for your reply, found that out also! last problem: i have > made mknod /dev/tun1 c 10 200 to setup the tun-device. but vtund reports > file descriptor in bad state (77). any clues on that? do i have to mknod > the device in a different place and symlink it in /dev/?? > > again - thank you for your help! > > regards, > stefan > > Vladimir Ivaschenko wrote: > > Uncomment "tun" module in /etc/modules > > > > stefan stДnz @ sichtwerk wrote: > > > >> hi vladimir, > >> > >> sorry to bug you again! one more question... > >> > >> i have seen, that wisp supports vtund! would be great to get it to > >> work... we are trying to set it up but always fail with the error > >> "can't allocate tun device....". any idea on how to get this to work? > >> it seems that a tun device does not exist on the system... any help is > >> greatly appreciated! > >> > >> cheers, > >> stefan > >> > >> Vladimir Ivaschenko wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> Standard WISP-Dist kernel does not support IPSec, you have to get the > >>> sources and integrate it into the kernel. > >>> > >>> stefan stДnz @ sichtwerk wrote: > >>> > >>>> hi vladimir, > >>>> > >>>> we tried to put ipsec.lrp and mawk.lrp on the flash. the thing wont > >>>> work anymore... have you ever used ipsec? any hints on how to get > >>>> this to work? > >>>> > >>>> best regards, > >>>> stefan > >>>> > >>>> ps: we were not able to solve the problem putting wisp on the flash > >>>> so far! funny thing is, that if we put the image on the flash all > >>>> works flawlessly! > >>>> > >>>> stefan stДnz @ sichtwerk wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > hey all, > >>>> > > >>>> > i have a major problem! i have a net4521 with a 128 mb hitachi cf > >>>> card. i want to use WISP (branch of LEAF / bering). installation and > >>>> first time boot is perfect! after saving the configuration and > >>>> rebooting the box, the file system seems to be screwed up... > >>>> > > >>>> > i have no clue if it is a geometry problem... the geometry that > >>>> the soekris bios reports and the one fdisk reports (both physical > >>>> and logical) are identical (978/8/32). > >>>> > > >>>> > here are some error when running the save config script: > >>>> > > >>>> > file_cluster badly computed!!! 1 <> 1073741808 > >>>> > file_cluster badly computed!!! 2 <> 1073741809 > >>>> > > >>>> > or > >>>> > > >>>> > invalidate: dirty buffer > >>>> > > >>>> > anybody any clue on hwo to fix this?? > >>>> > > >>>> > thanks in advance to the list! > >>>> > > >>>> > cheers, > >>>> > stefan > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > >
-- Best Regards, Vladimir Ivaschenko Thunderworx - Systems Engineer (RHCE) ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ leaf-wisp-dist mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-wisp-dist
