Gerry, The default gateway should be 11.11.11.254 everywhere.
Also, I suggest to use IPs from 11.11.11.0/24 range on ath0 if you want to be able to check connectivity from the WISP-Dist units themselves. Gerry Weaver wrote about "RE: [leaf-wisp] Interesting routing problem": > Hi Vladimir, > > I have not been able to get layer 3 bridging to work. The setup is below. > > CPE: eth0(11.11.11.1) ath0(10.10.10.1) <===========> AP: ath0(10.10.10.2) > eth0(11.11.11.2) > > I can ping the AP address (10.10.10.2) from the CPE > I can ping the CPE address (10.10.10.1) from the AP > I cannot ping anything on the 11.11.11.0/24 network > > I have tried various default gateways for each side. No matter what it will > not pass the traffic. > 10.10.10.1 and 10.10.10.2 respectively > 11.11.11.1 and 11.11.11.2 respectively > 11.11.11.254 (T1 router) > > Nothing seems to work. Any thoughts? > > Thanks, > Gerry > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vladimir Ivaschenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2004 3:13 PM > To: Gerry Weaver > Cc: Leaf-Wisp-Dist > Subject: Re: [leaf-wisp] Interesting routing problem > > > Gerry, > > If the addresses are unused, why do you want to route them? > > As soon as new machine is inserted, layer 3 bridging code will "see" it. > > Gerry Weaver wrote: > > Hi Vladimir, > > > > Sorry.. What I meant was the range of ip addresses that were not in use > per > > "2." below. I guess I don't really care what method is used to get the > thing > > working. The best solution would be if the point to point link were a > > transparent bridge. This would be a lot simpler. Have you, or anyone else, > > been able to get a link working that way? > > > > BTW: I'm nearing completion on the network config library for the command > > line interface. I'll send it to you for your review when the code is > > complete. > > > > > > Thanks, > > Gerry > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Vladimir Ivaschenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 3:48 AM > > To: Gerry Weaver > > Cc: Leaf-Wisp-Dist > > Subject: Re: [leaf-wisp] Interesting routing problem > > > > > > > > What do you mean by "full block of available addresses"? > > > > Another alternative is to VTUN. It will allow you to setup an Ethernet > > tunnel between two boxes. The drawback is the overhead (each Ethernet > > frame will be encapsulated into IP packet). > > > > Gerry Weaver wrote: > > > >>Hello All, > >> > >>I have come across a bit of a routing challenge. I need to do a point to > >>point link with 2 wisp-dist boxes. Here are the specifics. > >> > >>1. The wireless nics in the wisp-dist boxes do not support promiscuous > > > > mode > > > >>making a layer 2 bridge impossible. > >>2. The network currently has x.x.x.1-x.x.x.10 and x.x.x.250-x.x.x.254 in > >>use. > >>3. The CPEs are getting addresses via dhcp within the available range. > >> > >>I would like to setup a proxy arp bridge, but I need to route the full > > > > block > > > >>of available addresses. The wisp-dist boxes need to act as a transparent > >>bridge. I assume I could set up subnet for the three blocks of addresses, > >>but I'm no routing wizard. Does anyone have any suggestions? > >> > >>Thanks in advance, > >>Gerry > >>--- > >>Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > >>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > >>Version: 6.0.576 / Virus Database: 365 - Release Date: 1/30/2004 > >> > >> > >> > >>------------------------------------------------------- > >>SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. > >>Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with > >>a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! > >>http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click > >>_______________________________________________ > >>leaf-wisp-dist mailing list > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-wisp-dist > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Best Regards, > > Vladimir Ivashchenko > > ThunderWorx - www.thunderworx.com > > Senior Systems Designer/Engineer > > > > > > --- > > Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > Version: 6.0.576 / Virus Database: 365 - Release Date: 1/30/2004 > > > > --- > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > Version: 6.0.576 / Virus Database: 365 - Release Date: 1/30/2004 > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. > > Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with > > a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! > > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click > > _______________________________________________ > > leaf-wisp-dist mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-wisp-dist > > > > > -- > Best Regards, > Vladimir Ivashchenko > ThunderWorx - www.thunderworx.com > Senior Systems Designer/Engineer > > > --- > Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.576 / Virus Database: 365 - Release Date: 1/30/2004 > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.576 / Virus Database: 365 - Release Date: 1/30/2004 > -- Best Regards, Vladimir Ivashchenko ThunderWorx - www.thunderworx.com Senior Systems Designer/Engineer ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click _______________________________________________ leaf-wisp-dist mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-wisp-dist
