Mpourtounis Dimitrios wrote about "[leaf-wisp] Busybox and ash": > I am wondering if there is a special reason that wisp-dist uses ash.dyn > for its shell, although the version of busybox used has sh > support... (e.g. ,maybe busybox's sh is not good enough)
Exactly, busybox'sh is not good enough (or was not good enough, as this arrangement was done a long time ago). -- Best Regards, Vladimir Ivashchenko ThunderWorx - www.thunderworx.com Senior Systems Designer/Engineer ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ leaf-wisp-dist mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-wisp-dist
