----- Original Message ----- From: "M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2008 7:19 AM
Subject: Re: [LEAPSECS] princes


In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
           "Clive D.W. Feather" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: Tony Finch said:
: > As well as the
: > egregious example of the pre-Julian Roman calendar, I'm amused and
: > disgusted by the anti-Jewish fiddles in the rules for determining Easter
: > to minimise when it coincides with Passover.
:
: Actually it was a pro-Jewish fiddle: by keeping the two dates apart it
: minimized the risk of religious riots and/or pogroms.

I doubt that riots or pogroms were much of an issue. The Christians were at that time neither numerous enough, nor powerful enough, to be in a position to pick on the Jews, over religion or anything else. Nor were the Jews interested in picking on the Christians; after all, they did worship the same God (the question of His parentage of a certain carpenter notwithstanding). As for the Romans, the fall of Masada pretty much ended the Jews' ability to stage any organized revolt, so for Rome it was a non-issue.

By the fourth century C.E. there was actually a sizable number of Christians who were perfectly content with an Easter celebration focused around the fourteenth of Nisan, which would have been the anniversary of you-know-what according to the Jewish calendar. This group were called the Quartodecimans, for obvius reasons. The group that eventualy won out in the early church coucils were more concerned with making sure Christianity was a distinct religion and not a Jewish sect, which is when Easter went from being Nisan 14 to the first Sunday after Nisan 14.

I was told in school a long time ago this was the same reason that
Christmas happened do late: It too was designed to not conflict with
Hanukkah and also the pagan solstice celebrations.  I have no source
for this information, so take it with a lot more skepticism than most
things you see here :-)

Again, the Romans couldn't have cared less about Hanukkah ("Feast of Rededication? All your temple are belong to us, and we've got the Arch of Titus to comemorate the fact."). It just happens that the Christians, under Constantine, co-opted the Roman feast of Saturnalia (December 25) which happens by sheer coincidence to overlap the eight-day Hanukkah period in SOME years, depending on the last insertion of Adar II (or whatever the month is, I'm too lazy to look it up now) in the Jewish calendar.

Brian
_______________________________________________
LEAPSECS mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs

Reply via email to