On Mon 2010-09-06T17:11:11 +0000, Poul-Henning Kamp hath writ: > So, Astronomers should Own Time, because they did it first, but > ITU-T should take time over from ITU-R because they are more recent ?
Rather because the ITU-T process is not as dysfunctional as the ITU-R. > Given that ITU-T is irrellevant and has been int since they did the > OSI-protocols, I see no point... Putting a bit more thought into it, the functional parts of the ITU-T tend to be an alphanumeric label applied to an already-working protocol. As such it is long the case that time decisively belongs to Dave Mills and the NTP crew. -- Steve Allen <s...@ucolick.org> WGS-84 (GPS) UCO/Lick Observatory Natural Sciences II, Room 165 Lat +36.99855 University of California Voice: +1 831 459 3046 Lng -122.06015 Santa Cruz, CA 95064 http://www.ucolick.org/~sla/ Hgt +250 m _______________________________________________ LEAPSECS mailing list LEAPSECS@leapsecond.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs
