On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 22:35 +0000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <1292102703.24926.29.ca...@localhost>, Paul Sheer writes: > > >Apply this principle as follows: ACCEPT that there are servers > >and desktops all over the world are MISCONFIGURED and do NOT > >have second-accurate syncronization, and are NEVER going to > >have second-accurate syncronization. > > Ohh we do, we most certainly do. > > But that does not allow us to ignore the servers which are > synchronized and which need to be synchronized to work. >
I disagree. It very much allows us to ignore those servers from a standards point of view. This is because by-and-large software is written for the "lowest common denominator". -paul _______________________________________________ LEAPSECS mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs
