On 12/22/2010 13:36, Steve Allen wrote:
So the rules are subject to arbitrary interpretation by sovereign
entities in order to serve their own historical/legal/practical
purposes. There is no evident international authority to which
computer implementations can conform without risk of flame war.
Anybody can defensibly claim justification for doing anything they want.
"That's the nice thing about standards... There's so many to choose from."
and
"You can't please all the people all the time."
which I think might be the first two things I've said after "my name is
Warner" that everybody in the group can at least mostly agree with :)
Warner
_______________________________________________
LEAPSECS mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs
