In message <[email protected]>, Step hen Colebourne writes:
>It is my opinion, coming from an open source background, >body currently defining leap seconds stops doing so with less than >100% consensus, then the leap second defining process would be forked. It is my experience, based on almost 25 years of open source experience, that such a fork would not have any ramifications outside his parents basement. Poul-Henning -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [email protected] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ LEAPSECS mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs
