On Apr 13, 2011, at 1:47 PM, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:

> On Apr 13, 2011, at 12:39, Rob Seaman <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> ...bearing in mind that "everyone" includes the nearly seven billion people 
>> who are completely unaware that a discussion is occurring and who would be 
>> perplexed to understand that the idea here is that the clocks on their 
>> wrists, walls, computers, and bedside stands will have nothing whatsoever to 
>> do with the obvious diurnal cadence of their lives...
> 
> For "human perception" this minute difference will be completely lost in the 
> noise compared to the seasonal changes.  The "diurnal cadence" is also 
> shifted significantly by moving, traveling, etc.  Most places the sun isn't 
> on the top of the sky at noon, anyway.
> 
> I think you'll find more people who accurately set their watches be surprised 
> that every few years time jumps (seemingly randomly) by a second.

Asked and answered a hundred times over since 1999.  Apparent solar timekeeping 
is a red herring.

Focus instead on the word "accurately" here.  What does this word mean?  Rather 
than look online, let's consult an actual book.  On p. 9 of "Data Reduction and 
Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences" (P. R. Bevington, McGraw-Hill, 1969) 
we have:

        'Accuracy:  Measure of how close the result of the experiment comes to 
the "true" value.
        Precision:  Measure of how exactly the result is determined without 
reference to any "true" value.'

(Double quotes in the original.)

The ITU is asserting that the true value doesn't matter, they are not asserting 
that there is no true value.  If they were doing the latter, they could 
simplify things even further by declaring there are 100,000 SI-seconds per day.

Rather they are saying that accuracy and precision can be smooshed together 
into the same concept.  Good luck with that.

(I see that Steve has already answered with a more parsimonious response - as 
usual :-)

Rob

_______________________________________________
LEAPSECS mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs

Reply via email to