Many thanks to Steve Allen who informed us on 2011-06-17 about
   three revealing documents:

 http://www.bipm.org/cc/CCTF/Allowed/18/CCTF_09-38_CGPM-ITU-resp.pdf
 http://www.bipm.org/cc/CCTF/Allowed/18/CCTF_09-37_UTC_possible_redefinition.pdf
 http://www.bipm.org/cc/CCTF/Allowed/18/CCTF_09-27_note_on_UTC-ITU-R.pdf

   I am not so much surprised that politics seem to play a big role
   in the lofty circles of the CCTF, the BIPM consultative committee
   on time and frequency.  What I find really embarrassing is in the
   third of the sources CCTF/09-27. In it, the CCTF state that

        "UT1 is computed from the raw observed universal time UT0
         by correcting it for the effect of polar motion on the
         longitude of the observing site."

   This hasn't even been fully correct during the times when UT1 was
   observed with zenith telescopes (before about 1980). It is incorrect
   today -- all the seven parameters of Earth orientation are of course
   determined together, and UT0 is no longer needed nor used by anybody.

   Do we really want those people decide on the future of UTC when
   they do not even know how UT1 is currently determined? And this
   document bears the logo of the BIPM and is signed by its director!

   Michael Deckers.
_______________________________________________
LEAPSECS mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs

Reply via email to