On 20 Jun 2011, at 22:46, Ian Batten <[email protected]> wrote: > > The UK academic community, both operationally and in terms of research > funding, played more than lip service to (in particular) X.400(84) and > X.400(88), and the careers of several high-quality researchers were arguably > expended on a protocol stack that would never achieve critical mass. ISODE > and PP are proof of that.
My mail relay is still called the PP switch and I think it is 20 years old this year. It hasn't run PP since 1997, though :-) The ISODE company still exists and still sells X.400 mail systems to government agencies that require a stricter security architecture than Internet mail provides. They seem to be doing quite well, too. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <[email protected]> http://dotat.at/ _______________________________________________ LEAPSECS mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs
