I've been reminded of this contribution to the 2003 Torino meeting:
http://www.ucolick.org/~sla/leapsecs/torino/seago.pdf
Don't know where it falls on the stuff-o-meter, but at 16 pages and with 33
references it seems "actual" enough.
This is a simulated email, however.
Rob
--
On Nov 17, 2011, at 2:25 PM, Rob Seaman wrote:
> "Actual stuff"? There's a whole other sermon…
>
> These are tools for characterizing an "actual effect" in the "actual sky"
> that will affect "actual operations" of the Air Force Space Command.
>
> The proceedings are being finalized and should be available next week. In
> the mean time feel free to read through the other presentations at:
>
> http://futureofutc.org/
>
> Extra credit if you can locate the sundial on Mars.
>
> Rob
> --
> On Nov 17, 2011, at 1:37 PM, Tony Finch wrote:
>
>> Rob Seaman <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Can you (or another participant) give me some concrete examples of
>>>> stuff that needs leap seconds and don't already have well established
>>>> mechanisms for adjusting the time output from their GPS or other time
>>>> keeping equipment appropriately?
>>>
>>> See
>>> http://www.cacr.caltech.edu/futureofutc/program/presentations/AAS_11-674_Storz.pptx.pdf
>>
>> That describes simulations, not actual stuff.
_______________________________________________
LEAPSECS mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs
