On 7 Dec, 2011, at 07:57 , Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > Consequently, if anybody claims that UT1 as distinct from UTC has > any relevance for birthcertificates, I want to see the proof, because > the claim is entirely nonsensical and counter intuitive in every > way.
Astrologers care, that's the demand that gave us Shanks & Pottenger. I'll bet the Mills comment is referring to that as well, since I can't think of any other practical use for knowing birth times in UT1. I heard the British Nautical Almanac still sells about 40,000 copies per year. I know who buys a lot of those too. Dennis Ferguson _______________________________________________ LEAPSECS mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs
