Warner Losh wrote:
>The current proposal has no leap hours, so wouldn't the subtraction be
>unbounded?
I think the point is to have a term for TAI - 35 s, or whatever the
formula ends up being. We'll need to distinguish between these time
scales at least:
(a) UTC with leap seconds up to 2017 and undefined after 2017
(b) TAI - 35 s (applicable both before and after 2017)
(c) UTC with leap seconds up to 2017 and no leaps afterwards (a composite
of (a) and (b), which will supposedly be called "UTC")
-zefram
_______________________________________________
LEAPSECS mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs
