In message <[email protected]>, Rob Seaman writes:
>I had been expecting one this December just past, not next.
Indeed, but I notice three details:
This leapsecond is scheduled on a saturday, if they had used december past
it would have been one of the more special fridays in the year, so it
may be a concern for minimizing impact on commerce.
This leapsecond was announced much later than usual.
This leapsecond was scheduled before the ITU-R meeting, to happen after.
Pure conspiracy theory:
"We don't want a leapsecond right before ITU-R, some people might
get emotional, but we want them to concentrate on the topic..."
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[email protected] | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
_______________________________________________
LEAPSECS mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs
