Tom Van Baak wrote: > The longer-term plot (http://ucolick.org/~sla/leapsecs/lod.pdf) makes it > clear there are no guarantees, but if this trend were to continue we will > have negative leap seconds 15 or 20 years from now. That would be good news > for the eliminate-leap-second-proposal since it would greatly extend the time > that |DUT1| remains small and ignorable.
We can speculate contrary to fact on all sorts of things (those are the "straw men" of the subject line), but rather I think this talking point is fairly neutral, or cuts both ways. Rob _______________________________________________ LEAPSECS mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs
