On Thu 2012/01/19 15:38:15 PDT, Warner Losh wrote in a message to: Leap Second Discussion List <[email protected]>
>So I'm not too optimistic since all the focus has been on >'let's just junk them entirely' with little middle ground >explored. The LEAPSECS list now has over 6000 messages by my count going back to the start. Particular points have been hashed over time and time again. Is it reasonable to expect interested parties, including members of the ITU, to sift through it all trying to collate and evaluate the arguments for and against? In the past I have suggested that a wiki be created to distill the information content and opinions expressed on this list. Considering the considerable time and energy still being devoted to contributions, perhaps just a little of it could be siphoned off to create some sort of summary before the 2015 RA. That way the middle ground may be a bit better explored. Mark Calabretta _______________________________________________ LEAPSECS mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs
