> We've given this some thought. One problem is that many of the contributors > of the list have taken a side and have been re-defining words to enhance > their bargaining positions. This makes a writing a wiki difficult.
Would it work if we had 3 wikis? One for the good guys, one for the bad guys, and one for the technical details that (almost?) everybody agreed on? An alternative is to pick an editor that everybody trusts. -- These are my opinions, not necessarily my employer's. I hate spam. _______________________________________________ LEAPSECS mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs
