On 2012 Jan 20, at 06:49, Stephen Colebourne wrote: > Some have suggested that leap seconds could be absorbed as a > "permanent offset change". One of the proposals that should be > written up is how that would work.
like this? http://www.ucolick.org/~sla/leapsecs/right+gps.html How much simplification is necessary before an ITU voting member can grok that? -- Steve Allen <[email protected]> WGS-84 (GPS) UCO/Lick Observatory Natural Sciences II, Room 165 Lat +36.99855 University of California Voice: +1 831 459 3046 Lng -122.06015 Santa Cruz, CA 95064 http://www.ucolick.org/~sla/ Hgt +250 m _______________________________________________ LEAPSECS mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs
