In message <[email protected]>, Hal Mu
rray writes:
>
>(from a day or two ago...)
>
>Brooks Harris <[email protected]> said:
>> So I ask your opinion(s) - Do you think there's a need for a document like
>> I've described? What standards body do you think would be receptive to the
>> idea? Or is it a fool's errand?
>
>If I was going to try to fix that, I think I would start by talking to the OS
>and POSIX people. I don't know if they would be receptive. Even if they
>were, it might still be a dead end, but then I would (might?) learn something.
You mean these people ?
http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2013/12/metaphor-for-the-day.html
And yes, those are "my crowd" and Charlie Stross is spot on about them.
So, yeah, good luck with that...
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[email protected] | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
_______________________________________________
LEAPSECS mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs
