On 2014-02-16 10:39 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
On Feb 16, 2014, at 11:20 AM, Brooks Harris wrote:
Only a comprehensive plan which aims to fix the obvious and well known problems is going 
to head off the "kill Leap Seconds" movement.
I think the momentum and general conservatism of the powers that be will do 
more to kill the plan than any other comprehensive plan. the status quo is 
powerful enough and works well enough that people are unwilling to risk a 
change.

Maybe. But we're still left with vague and difficult implementations that have known problems.


Or will we just roll over and watch 4500 years of timekeeping tradition 
evaporate?
The kill the leap second stuff doesn't kill 4500 years of timekeeping 
tradition. Leap seconds broke with tradition my making minutes longer than 60s. 
It accepted there's an error between the time in London and the time we 
coordinate on and that's OK. The leap second moved one step away from the sun 
by averaging out the noise into discrete steps.
Right. Well I see it slightly differently. For centuries timekeeping sought to align the observed positions to some "absolute time reference", long recognizing the days length didn't divide into a year. Pope Gregory (partly) fixed that. Then when atomic clocks could keep very accurate time and astronomical observations were extremely precise we were finally in a position to quantify the difference between absolute time and observed rotational position. Integral seconds (Leap Seconds) was deemed accurate enough to solve the problem for general purposes. So I see UTC as the latest and greatest version of 4500 years of timekeeping tradition.


Moving to atomic time doesn't undo 4500 years of timekeeping tradition. In 
fact, it restores the tradition of all minutes being the same length.
I think it abandons the long sought goal of aligning civil time to the position of the Sun. The "tradition of all minutes being the same length" was the best anybody could do. Everyone knew it wasn't exactly right. UTC solved that.

-Brooks

_______________________________________________
LEAPSECS mailing list
LEAPSECS@leapsecond.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs

Reply via email to